Independent migration QA · second opinion
Before cutover, ask what the migration evidence does not prove.
Movetali can review a Zapier or Make → n8n migration without taking over the client relationship. The goal is a bounded second opinion on coverage, gaps, parity evidence, rollback readiness, and cutover blockers.
Useful for direct buyers or agencies that want an independent QA layer before production change.
Audit output
A second opinion should end in explicit findings, not “looks good.”
| Area | Question | Evidence expected | Possible finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source coverage | Did every relevant source step make it into scope? | Inventory + source-to-target mapping | Covered / excluded / missing |
| Gaps | Are unsupported, manual or transformed steps explicit? | Gap ledger with owner/action | Accepted / remediate / blocker |
| Parity | Does the candidate prove agreed business behavior? | Acceptance cases + captured outcomes | Pass / insufficient evidence / fail |
| Credentials | Is production access customer-controlled? | Rebind boundary and owner | Clear / unclear / blocker |
| Rollback | Can production return safely to the source path? | Trigger matrix + switching order + recovery checks | Ready / incomplete / blocker |
Possible audit decisions
Blocking evidence is present and remaining differences are explicitly accepted.
The migration may be viable, but a smaller or safer scope should prove the risky behavior first.
Specific evidence or migration gaps must be fixed before cutover review can pass.
The current platform remains the better decision when economics, ownership or verifiability are weak.
Agency-safe positioning
For agencies, the audit can be scoped as independent migration QA, parity review, rollback review or bounded overflow. The agency keeps the customer relationship; Movetali reviews only the agreed technical evidence and does not silently broaden scope.
Review migration coverage and evidence before the agency hands work to its client.
Check blocking parity and rollback readiness before production ownership changes.
Monitoring can remain a separate recurring reliability layer where supported.
Related evidence
Independent review starts with fit
Get a bounded second opinion before the production switch.
The Fit Check is free. Technical preflight defines what can be reviewed and what evidence is missing.